[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130820203034.GC17845@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:30:34 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
jiada_wang@...tor.com, robherring2@...il.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org, vapier@...too.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
shawn.guo@...aro.org, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
LW@...O-electronics.de, t.figa@...sung.com, g.liakhovetski@....de,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clk: add common __clk_get(), __clk_put()
implementations
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:34:20PM +0200, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
> +int __clk_get(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + if (WARN_ON((!clk)))
> + return 0;
This changes the behaviour of clk_get()
> +
> + if (!try_module_get(clk->owner))
> + return 0;
If you want this to be safe against NULL pointers, just do this:
if (clk && !try_module_get(clk->owner))
return 0;
> +
> + return 1;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__clk_get);
> +
> +void __clk_put(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + if (!clk || IS_ERR(clk))
> + return;
> +
> + module_put(clk->owner);
Calling clk_put() with an error-pointer should be a Bad Thing and something
that shouldn't be encouraged, so trapping it is probably unwise. So, just
do here:
if (clk)
module_put(clk->owner);
If we do have some callers of this with ERR pointers, then we could add:
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)))
return;
and remove it after a full kernel cycle or so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists