linux-kernel - Re: [patch 5/9] mm + fs: store shadow entries in page cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:59:15 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roman Gushchin <klamm@...dex-team.ru>,
	Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@...usdata.com>,
	Metin Doslu <metin@...usdata.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] mm + fs: store shadow entries in page cache

On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:31:19 -0400 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org> wrote:

> Reclaim will be leaving shadow entries in the page cache radix tree
> upon evicting the real page.  As those pages are found from the LRU,
> an iput() can lead to the inode being freed concurrently.  At this
> point, reclaim must no longer install shadow pages because the inode
> freeing code needs to ensure the page tree is really empty.
> 
> Add an address_space flag, AS_EXITING, that the inode freeing code
> sets under the tree lock before doing the final truncate.  Reclaim
> will check for this flag before installing shadow pages.
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/fs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/inode.c
> @@ -503,6 +503,7 @@ void clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irq(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
>  	BUG_ON(inode->i_data.nrpages);
> +	BUG_ON(inode->i_data.nrshadows);
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
>  	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_data.private_list));
>  	BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING));
> @@ -545,10 +546,14 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode)
>  	 */
>  	inode_wait_for_writeback(inode);
>  
> +	spin_lock_irq(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);
> +	mapping_set_exiting(&inode->i_data);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&inode->i_data.tree_lock);

mapping_set_exiting() is atomic and the locking here probably doesn't do
anythng useful.


>  	if (op->evict_inode) {
>  		op->evict_inode(inode);
>  	} else {
> -		if (inode->i_data.nrpages)
> +		if (inode->i_data.nrpages || inode->i_data.nrshadows)
>  			truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
>  		clear_inode(inode);
>  	}
> 
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -416,6 +416,7 @@ struct address_space {
>  	struct mutex		i_mmap_mutex;	/* protect tree, count, list */
>  	/* Protected by tree_lock together with the radix tree */
>  	unsigned long		nrpages;	/* number of total pages */
> +	unsigned long		nrshadows;	/* number of shadow entries */
>  	pgoff_t			writeback_index;/* writeback starts here */
>  	const struct address_space_operations *a_ops;	/* methods */
>  	unsigned long		flags;		/* error bits/gfp mask */

This grows the size of the in-core inode.  There can be tremendous
numbers of those so this was a significantly costly change.

And this whole patchset contains no data which permits us to agree that
this cost was worthwhile.

> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> index b6854b7..db3a78b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ enum mapping_flags {
>  	AS_MM_ALL_LOCKS	= __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 2,	/* under mm_take_all_locks() */
>  	AS_UNEVICTABLE	= __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 3,	/* e.g., ramdisk, SHM_LOCK */
>  	AS_BALLOON_MAP  = __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 4, /* balloon page special map */
> +	AS_EXITING	= __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 5, /* inode is being evicted */

This is far too little documentation.  I suggest adding the complete
rationale at the mapping_set_exiting() definition site.  Or perhaps at
the mapping_set_exiting callsite in evict().

>  };
>  
> 
> ...
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/