[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1377034669.2737.83@driftwood>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:37:49 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Richard Yao <ryao@...too.org>, chanho.min@....com,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why are BSD-licensed LZ4 symbols GPL exported?
On 08/20/2013 12:38:14 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 18:11 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:19:56PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
> > > Why are the LZ4 symbols being GPL-exported when the LZ4 code is
> > > BSD-licensed and no substantial changes appear to have been made
> when it
> > > was merged?
> >
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is intended an indication that using a symbol is
> > likely to result in you producing a derived work of the kernel, and
> the
> > kernel as a whole is under the GPL. It has nothing to do with
> additional
> > licenses that individual pieces of code may be available under.
>
> Maybe not.
>
> http://www.ifross.org/en/artikel/ongoing-dispute-over-value-exportsymbolgpl-function
Kernel developers: "We're making symbols that we, as the creators of
this project, don't think you can use without the result being a
derived work".
Lawyers: "we're prepared to argue over the definitions of 'that', 'as',
'of', 'this', 'use', and 'the', as long as we're paid by the hour."
This random speculation outside of a courtroom actually capable of
setting precedent strikes you as relevant for what reason?
Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists