linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V8 00/33] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:46:56 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Maxim V. Patlasov" <mpatlasov@...allels.com>,
	Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 00/33] loop: Issue O_DIRECT aio using bio_vec

On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:00:56 -0700 Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> As I've seen very few replies to this:  how do we ensure this gets
> picked up for the 3.12 merge window?  The series has been a reposted
> a few times without complaints or major changes,

That's probably a sign that nobody bothered reading it all :( The
smattering of acks in there is not encouraging.

Please add Sedat's Tested-by (thanks!)

Please add performance test results.

Mel, do you have any swap-over-nfs test cases which should be performed?

Dave, what sort of correctness/robustness tests have you been running?

Yes, I guess it's not a bad idea to get this into -next, but it does
seem to have been pretty low-profile...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/