[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130821115739.GA2965@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:57:39 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"dhowells@...hat.com" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: user_namespace: always set the return
parameter 'new_cred' when call unshare_userns() successfully.
On 08/21, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> On 08/20/2013 10:37 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/20, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> But the only existing caller (sys_unshare) does in fact initialize it to
> >> NULL. So while this patch does no harm, is it necessary?
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > Plus, with this patch unshare_userns() becomes "inconsistent" compared
> > to other unshare_ helpers.
> >
>
> Hmm... for static functions, they don't need, but for extern functions,
> recommend to do so.
>
>
> For "unshare_ helpers", I find 3 extern functions:
>
> unshare_files() which already set value.
> unshare_userns() and unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() which not set.
>
> In my opinion, recommend to always set the return parameter when
> succeed, for the 2 left extern functions.
I do not think that static/extern should make any difference. To me,
the cleanup should make unshare_userns() return "cred *" (or NULL or
ERR_PTR()) But this is subjective and in this case we should change
other unshare_ helpers too. Doesn't worth the trouble.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists