[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377046241-18516-3-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:50:40 +0800
From: Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
To: <tj@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
<guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] workqueue: Fix manage_workers() RETURNS description
No functional change. The comment of function manage_workers()
RETURNS description is obvious wrong, same as the CONTEXT.
Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Libin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 26644ce..46a0de0 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2034,8 +2034,11 @@ static bool maybe_destroy_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
* multiple times. Does GFP_KERNEL allocations.
*
* RETURNS:
- * spin_lock_irq(pool->lock) which may be released and regrabbed
- * multiple times. Does GFP_KERNEL allocations.
+ * %false if the pool don't need management and the caller can safely
+ * start processing works, %true indicates that the function released
+ * pool->lock and reacquired it to perform some management function
+ * and that the conditions that the caller verified while holding the
+ * lock before calling the function might no longer be true.
*/
static bool manage_workers(struct worker *worker)
{
--
1.8.2.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists