[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130821130647.GB19286@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 09:06:47 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, robert.moore@...el.com, lv.zheng@...el.com,
rjw@...k.pl, lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86, acpi: Move acpi_initrd_override() earlier.
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:15:35PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> [What are we doing]
>
> We are trying to initialize acip tables as early as possible. But Linux kernel
> allows users to override acpi tables by specifying their own tables in initrd.
> So we have to do acpi_initrd_override() earlier first.
So, are we now back to making SRAT info as early as possible? What
happened to just co-locating early allocations close to kernel image?
What'd be the benefit of doing this over that?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists