linux-kernel - Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dc8456d1-a89a-44c0-bebb-83cb0526230e@email.android.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:11:25 +0200
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
CC:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Xen-devel@...ts.xen.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: Regression: x86/mm: new _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY bit conflicts with existing use

Eep.  This should be reverted, indeed.  This isn't a manifest bug on !Xen but we have gotten requests for WT support which would mean adding in the PAT but again.

David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>All,
>
>179ef71c (mm: save soft-dirty bits on swapped pages) introduces a new
>PTE bit on x86 _PTE_SWP_SOFT_DIRTY which has the same value as _PTE_PSE
>and _PTE_PAT.
>
>With a Xen PV guest, the use of the _PTE_PAT will result in the page
>having unexpected cachability which will introduce a range of subtle
>performance and correctness issues.  Xen programs the entry 4 in the
>PAT
>table with WC so a page that was previously WB will end up as WC.
>
>The use of this bit also appears to preclude the use of (transparent)
>huge pages by the application.  It is not clear if there is something
>else guaranteeing that that there will be no huge pages.
>
>To fix this regression I suggest one or more of:
>
>1. If no other changes are made, at a mimimum, MEM_SOFT_DIRTY must
>require !XEN and possibly !TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE and !HUGETLBFS.  This
>would prevent this option being enabled on the majority of standard
>Linux distributions.
>
>2. Find a different PTE bit to (re)use.
>
>3. Avoid clearing the soft dirty bit when repopulating a swapped out
>page.
>
>4. Redesign the soft dirty tracking to not require the use of
>architecture specific PTE bits.  e.g., by using a shadow set of
>structures for the soft dirty bit tracking.
>
>David

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/