[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130821141725.GB20685@1wt.eu>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:17:25 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed stable release changes
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 09:42:48AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Personally, I still let my stable patches that go into later -rc sit
> in linux-next for a few days before pushing them to mainline. I may even
> wait for the next -rc to push it just to make sure the patch wont cause
> more issues. But I know others that just send the fix directly to
> mainline without going through linux-next. Those, I would think, are the
> most prone to cause issues in stable.
This is also what I suspected though I have no data to confirm or deny that.
If this happens to be the case, maybe then there should be some barrier such
as :
- everything merged at -rc4 or before gets backported after the next -rc
- everything from -rc5 and upper waits for next -rc1 unless tagged urgent ?
Willy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists