[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL1RGDVSrf6++PMdfnAZAUw=QX0VbQ9Wck+v=7ebfc-_FXJ_NA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:38:21 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Martin Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...ionio.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Giridhar Malavali <giridhar.malavali@...gic.com>,
Chad Dupuis <chad.dupuis@...gic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] tcm_qla2xxx: Add special case for COMPARE_AND_WRITE data_direction
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
<nab@...erainc.com> wrote:
> Add a special case for COMPARE_AND_WRITE for the reverse data direction
> mapping used for pci_map_sg() + friends.
I don't understand this. In fact the whole patch series looks quite
confused. COMPARE AND WRITE is a normal Data-Out command, with no
requirement for special bidirectional handling or anything like that.
The only slightly unusual thing is that a CAW command with a NUMBER OF
LOGICAL BLOCKS equal to N will actually transfer 2*N worth of data --
one set of data for the compare operation and a second set to write if
the compare succeeds. But just to be clear, the transfer of those 2*N
blocks happens as a single transfer during the Data-Out phase.
- R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists