[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1377048987.2737.89@driftwood>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:36:27 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rfc: trivial patches and slow deaths?
On 08/20/2013 07:22:36 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:10 -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > The important question is does he want to handle patches that you're
> > flipping out about not going in before the next merge window because
> > they are SO IMPORTANT that the trivial tree must promote them out of
> > sequence.
>
> You're misreading. I see no flipping out here.
>
> I'm simply saying that obvious defects should be
> corrected sooner rather than later.
>
> I'm also saying that the trivial tree should
> have some visibility about whether or not a
> patch or series will be handled by the trivial
> maintainer or not.
I fetch his git and look at the log of the branch to see which of the
documentation patches I forwarded are there. That said, there's no
guarantee they'll go in from there because other maintainers often grab
them and put them in through their trees.
> Jiri has not responded to this point.
He did. Twice.
> Silence about the status of patches that extends
> for months is not good.
He has a public git tree. It's listed in his MAINTAINERS entry. I've
found that if a patch isn't in there, he hasn't picked it up yet. (I've
been feeding Documentation patches through his tree, hence my interest
in this thread.)
Rob--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists