[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130821155416.GH5262@sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:54:16 -0500
From: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Dwight Engen <dwight.engen@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Gao feng <gaofeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
Hey Stephen,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:22:46AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:28:44 -0500 Ben Myers <bpm@....com> wrote:
> > I'd prefer not to break Stephen's tree two days in a row. We could just revert
> > d6970d4b726c in the xfs tree for the time being as Stephen has done, but given
> > the choice would prefer the fix. Do you have a preference between the two
> > approaches that Dwight has posted? The first seems more conservative...
>
> I will automatically revert that commit when I merge the xfs tree until
> some other solution is forthcoming (so you don't have to do the revert in
> the xfs tree).
Gah. That makes sense. ;)
> This does need to be fixed fairly soon, though.
Agreed, thanks.
-Ben
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists