| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:07:42 -0400 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> Subject: Re: [PATCH] idr: Use this_cpu_ptr() for percpu_ida Hello, Kent. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:01:32PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > I think Tejun and I might be at a bit of an impasse with the ida rewrite > itself, but I don't think there were any outstanding objections to the > percpu ida code itself - and this is a standalone version. The percpu ida code can be applied separately from the ida rewrite? > I was meaning to ask you Andrew, if you could take a look at the ida > discussion and lend your opinion - I don't think there's any _specific_ > technical objections left to my ida code, and it's now on a more > philisophical "complexity vs. ..." level. Hmmm... the objection was pretty specific - don't depend on high-order or vmalloc allocations when it can be easily avoided by using proper radix tree. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists