[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201308212051.46453.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:51:46 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/17] ARM: call clk_of_init from time_init
On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/20/2013 02:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 August 2013, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Hmm. This probably isn't too hard. I /think/ the only reason the clocks
> are initialized early is:
>
> * The PMC HW block is involved in the path of some interrupts (i.e. it
> inverts, or not, the IRQ input pin dedicated to the PMIC).
>
> * So, that part of the PMC must be initialized early so that the IRQ
> polarity is correct.
>
> * The PMC initialization is currently monolithic, and the PMC has some
> clock inputs, so the init routine ends up calling of_clk_get_by_name(),
> and hence clocks must be set up early too.
>
> Perhaps if we just separate tegra_pmc_init() into two functions which
> initialize different parts of the PMC, we can get rid of the
> tegra_dt_init_irq() -> tegra_pmc_init() -> of_clk_get_by_name() call
> path, and hence move Tegra's call to of_clk_init() to the typical place.
That sounds good to me, thanks for looking into it.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists