[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+8MBbKxcQCq8XdYakG5Dg8F_G8NunQjca-TyZbn4q0v3okaqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:54:01 -0700
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed stable release changes
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> We don't want to run daily snapshots of your tree though, right? Only
> -rcs because the daily states are kinda arbitrary and they can be broken
> in various ways. Or are we at a point in time where we can amend that
> rule?
If *nobody* runs daily snapshots - then problems just sit latent all week until
the -rc is released and people start testing. Doesn't sound optimal.
Running daily git snapshots can be "exciting" during the merge window. But
I rarely see problems running a random build after -rc1. If you are still
running that ancient 3.11-rc6 released on Sunday - then you are missing out
on 28 commits worth of goodness since then :-)
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists