[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYa8QTxY7u_5-wXzQq2yu8sgKKH5dOP=iYHsrrz8g2HOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:44:55 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/33] ARM: ux500: Supply the I2C clocks lookup to the
DBX500 DT
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi
>> > @@ -572,6 +572,8 @@
>> > v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>;
>> >
>> > clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> > + clocks = <&prcc_kclk 3 3>, <&prcc_pclk 3 3>;
>> > + clock-names = "nmk-i2c.0", "apb_pclk";
>>
>> To avoid confusing the clock name "nmk-i2c.0" with the device
>> name in Linux of that device instance, can we use a name such
>> that it is clear that this is not a dev_name match?
>>
>> "i2c0" works just fine as name I think?
>
> If you do that, then I think you need to change all of these too:
>
> git grep -e "\.0" -e "\.1" -e "\.2" -e "\.3" -- drivers/clk/ux500/
No, as I said in some other patch, all these clk_register_clkdev()s
are unused in device tree boots and should not even be executed
on the DT boot path.
(But maybe you've proven me wrong there in this other
thread ...)
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists