linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/33] ARM: ux500: Supply the I2C clocks lookup to the DBX500 DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:44:55 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Srinidhi KASAGAR <srinidhi.kasagar@...ricsson.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/33] ARM: ux500: Supply the I2C clocks lookup to the
 DBX500 DT

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi
>> > @@ -572,6 +572,8 @@
>> >                         v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>;
>> >
>> >                         clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> > +                       clocks = <&prcc_kclk 3 3>, <&prcc_pclk 3 3>;
>> > +                       clock-names = "nmk-i2c.0", "apb_pclk";
>>
>> To avoid confusing the clock name "nmk-i2c.0" with the device
>> name in Linux of that device instance, can we use a name such
>> that it is clear that this is not a dev_name match?
>>
>> "i2c0" works just fine as name I think?
>
> If you do that, then I think you need to change all of these too:
>
> git grep -e "\.0" -e "\.1" -e "\.2" -e "\.3" -- drivers/clk/ux500/

No, as I said in some other patch, all these clk_register_clkdev()s
are unused in device tree boots and should not even be executed
on the DT boot path.

(But maybe you've proven me wrong there in this other
thread ...)

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/