[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1493410.kWm56FEZ0a@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:20:34 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: create & use cpufreq_generic_init() routine
On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 08:12:19 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Many CPUFreq drivers for SMP system (where all cores share same clock lines), do
> similar stuff in their ->init() part.
>
> This patch creates a generic routine in cpufreq core which can be used by these
> so that we can remove some redundant code. And later part of patchset makes
> other drivers use this infrastructure.
>
> Many drivers which weren't setting policy->cpus haven't been updated as they
> might have separate clocks for CPUs and setting all CPUs in policy->cpus may
> corrupt them..
>
> This is Sixth part of my cleanup work for CPUFreq, first five are (And
> obviously its rebased over them):
OK, so the plan for merging this will be that we'll put 1 into linux-next
and add 2 to it after a few days etc. to give people a chance to test one
set of changes before going to the next one.
> 1: cpufreq: Introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/8/263
So perhaps we can *try* to push the above for 3.12 if it doesn't breaks
stuff left and right.
Can you please resend it with all of the ACKs collected so far?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists