[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQW1c3-d+iMebRK6JyHCpMt8mjga-TnsfTuVsC1bQZqsYA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:28:29 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/sparse: introduce alloc_usemap_and_memmap
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Yinghai,
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:02:17PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> - /* ok, last chunk */
>>>> - sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node(usemap_map, pnum_begin, NR_MEM_SECTIONS,
>>>> - usemap_count, nodeid_begin);
>>>> + alloc_usemap_and_memmap(usemap_map, true);
>>
>>alloc_usemap_and_memmap() is somehow confusing.
>>
>>Please check if you can pass function pointer instead of true/false.
>>
>
> sparse_early_usemaps_alloc_node and sparse_early_mem_maps_alloc_node is
> similar, however, one has a parameter unsigned long ** and the other has
> struct page **. function pointer can't help, isn't it? ;-)
you could have one generic function pointer like
void *alloc_func(void *data);
and in the every alloc function, have own struct data to pass in/out...
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists