linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:10:33 +0200
From:	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
To:	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration

On 08/16/13 11:41, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> On 15/08/13 18:09, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>>
>> This patch removes the declaration of the function 'of_get_cpu_node'
>> which is not defined for openrisc. This is in preparation to move
>> it's definition from PPC to DT common code.
>>
>> Again it could be there as it was originally copied from powerpc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> Since both microblaze and openrisc have moderated lists which I am not
> member of, these patches were blocked. Michal Simek agreed to remove
> this for microblaze. Do you see any concern with this patch for openrisc
> ? Can I have you ACK if it looks fine ?

Hi Sudeep,
Yes, thanks, the patch looks good.

Acked-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>

/Jonas

>
> Regards,
> Sudeep
>> ---
>>   arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h | 3 ---
>>   1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h
>> index bbb34e5..eb59bfe 100644
>> --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h
>> +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/prom.h
>> @@ -44,9 +44,6 @@ void of_parse_dma_window(struct device_node *dn, const void *dma_window_prop,
>>   
>>   extern void kdump_move_device_tree(void);
>>   
>> -/* CPU OF node matching */
>> -struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu, unsigned int *thread);
>> -
>>   /* Get the MAC address */
>>   extern const void *of_get_mac_address(struct device_node *np);
>>   
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/