[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y57u19ur.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:38:12 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] mm, hugetlb: fix subpool accounting handling
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> writes:
> Hello, Aneesh.
>
> First of all, thank you for review!
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 02:58:20PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> writes:
>>
>> > If we alloc hugepage with avoid_reserve, we don't dequeue reserved one.
>> > So, we should check subpool counter when avoid_reserve.
>> > This patch implement it.
>>
>> Can you explain this better ? ie, if we don't have a reservation in the
>> area chg != 0. So why look at avoid_reserve.
>
> We don't consider avoid_reserve when chg != 0.
> Look at following code.
>
> + if (chg || avoid_reserve)
> + if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, 1))
>
> It means that if chg != 0, we skip to check avoid_reserve.
when whould be avoid_reserve == 1 and chg == 0 ?
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists