[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1377157838.2633.67.camel@ThinkPad-T5421>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:50:38 +0800
From: Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-next list <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH next]module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed
too early
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 16:30 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:49:58PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > > struct kobj_type module_ktype = {
> > > + .release = module_kobj_release,
> > > .sysfs_ops = &module_sysfs_ops,
> > > };
> >
> > Wait, as there is no release function here for the kobject (a different
> > problem), why is the deferred release function causing any problems?
> > There is no release function to call, so what is causing the oops?
>
> Because DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE does the kobject_put() sometime later,
> which is what causes the oops.
>
> Since kobjects don't have an owner field, AFAICT someone *could* grab
> one in a module which is unloading, then put it after unload. So this
> fixes a real bug, albeit not one seen in the real world.
>
> Applied,
Oh, thank you, Rusty.
I just sent out another version... which fix it in another way as Greg
suggested, could you please also help to take a look at it?
Thanks, Zhong
> Rusty.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists