[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130822190848.GA25053@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:08:48 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-audit@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/12] pid: rewrite task helper functions avoiding
task->pid and task->tgid
On 08/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
>
> static inline int is_global_init(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> - return tsk->pid == 1;
> + return task_pid_nr(tsk) == 1;
> }
Probably it would be better to simply kill it. Almost every usage is
wrong.
> static inline bool is_idle_task(const struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return p->pid == 0;
> + return task_pid(p) == &init_struct_pid;
> }
hmm. there should be a simpler check for this...
> static inline int has_group_leader_pid(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - return p->pid == p->tgid;
> + return task_pid(p) == task_tgid(p);
> }
>
> static inline
> int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
> {
> - return p1->tgid == p2->tgid;
> + return task_tgid(p1) == task_tgid(p2);
This is suboptinal. See the attached
include-linux-schedh-dont-use-task-pid-tgid-in-same_thread_group-has_group_leader_pid.patch
from -mm below.
Oleg.
--- a/include/linux/sched.h~include-linux-schedh-dont-use-task-pid-tgid-in-same_thread_group-has_group_leader_pid
+++ a/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2179,15 +2179,15 @@ static inline bool thread_group_leader(s
* all we care about is that we have a task with the appropriate
* pid, we don't actually care if we have the right task.
*/
-static inline int has_group_leader_pid(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline bool has_group_leader_pid(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return p->pid == p->tgid;
+ return task_pid(p) == p->signal->leader_pid;
}
static inline
-int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
+bool same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
{
- return p1->tgid == p2->tgid;
+ return p1->signal == p2->signal;
}
static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists