[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzR71kJOOVzHKKaXW2Ph7wb6ivtVHPeR49PPcqpiCfPsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:44:05 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Tighten up linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH)
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> Let me rephrase that: why do we allow these types of lookup to recurse
> like normal symlinks? I'm proposing that these links immediately
> terminate lookup [..]
It can nest *inside* a regular symlink. So there should not be any
recursion of pure /proc style symlink jumps, but they live within the
nesting that is normal symlink behavior.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists