linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci: Add pci_walk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:49:26 -0600
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Add pci_walk_slot() interface

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:34 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> > We have a pci_walk_bus() interface, but it's exceptionally cumbersome
> > for the callback function to figure out if the device is relevant if
> > the caller is trying to walk all the devices in or below a slot.  Add
> > a variant to walk only slot devices.
> 
> Is it really exceptionally cumbersome?  You can supply the top-level
> slot in the userdata.  Can you then use something like this in the
> callback?
> 
>     bool dev_below_slot(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_slot *slot)
>     {
>         if (!dev)
>             return false;
>         if (dev->slot == slot)
>             return true;
>         return dev_below_slot(dev->bus->self, slot);
>     }

Maybe I should have said it's ugly and inefficient rather than
cumbersome.  This feels like a backwards way to do it, but if you don't
want a walk_slot interface, then it looks like this would work.  Thanks,

Alex


> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > This allows me to use pci_walk_bus() and pci_walk_slot() instead of
> > rolling my own for iterating devices for bus/slot reset.  Please
> > consider for 3.12 to go with the rest of the bus/slot infrastructure.
> >
> >  drivers/pci/bus.c   |   56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/pci.h |    2 ++
> >  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/bus.c b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > index b1ff02a..316579a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/bus.c
> > @@ -283,6 +283,62 @@ void pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_walk_bus);
> >
> > +/** pci_walk_slot - walk devices in/under slot, calling callback.
> > + *  @slot     slot whose devices should be walked
> > + *  @cb       callback to be called for each device found
> > + *  @userdata arbitrary pointer to be passed to callback.
> > + *
> > + *  Walk the given slot, including any bridged devices
> > + *  on buses under this slot.  Call the provided callback
> > + *  on each device found.
> > + *
> > + *  We check the return of @cb each time. If it returns anything
> > + *  other than 0, we break out.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +void pci_walk_slot(struct pci_slot *slot, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> > +                  void *userdata)
> > +{
> > +       struct pci_dev *dev;
> > +       struct pci_bus *bus;
> > +       struct list_head *next;
> > +       int retval;
> > +
> > +       bus = slot->bus;
> > +       down_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> > +       next = slot->bus->devices.next;
> > +       for (;;) {
> > +               if (next == &bus->devices) {
> > +                       /* end of this bus, go up or finish */
> > +                       if (bus == slot->bus)
> > +                               break;
> > +                       next = bus->self->bus_list.next;
> > +                       bus = bus->self->bus;
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> > +               dev = list_entry(next, struct pci_dev, bus_list);
> > +
> > +               /* skip anything on the top level bus not in our slot */
> > +               if (dev->bus == slot->bus && dev->slot != slot) {
> > +                       next = dev->bus_list.next;
> > +                       continue;
> > +               }
> > +
> > +               if (dev->subordinate) {
> > +                       /* this is a pci-pci bridge, do its devices next */
> > +                       next = dev->subordinate->devices.next;
> > +                       bus = dev->subordinate;
> > +               } else
> > +                       next = dev->bus_list.next;
> > +
> > +               retval = cb(dev, userdata);
> > +               if (retval)
> > +                       break;
> > +       }
> > +       up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_walk_slot);
> > +
> >  struct pci_bus *pci_bus_get(struct pci_bus *bus)
> >  {
> >         if (bus)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
> > index daf40cd..cbb291b 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pci.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h
> > @@ -1087,6 +1087,8 @@ int pci_scan_bridge(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *dev, int max,
> >
> >  void pci_walk_bus(struct pci_bus *top, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> >                   void *userdata);
> > +void pci_walk_slot(struct pci_slot *slot, int (*cb)(struct pci_dev *, void *),
> > +                 void *userdata);
> >  int pci_cfg_space_size_ext(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  int pci_cfg_space_size(struct pci_dev *dev);
> >  unsigned char pci_bus_max_busnr(struct pci_bus *bus);
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/