linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130822231054.GA31973@kroah.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:10:54 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>,
	Gilad Avidov <gavidov@...eaurora.org>,
	Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 2/5] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI

On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:37:09PM -0700, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> +static char dbgfs_help[] =
> +	"SPMI Debug-FS support\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Hierarchy schema:\n"
> +	"/sys/kernel/debug/spmi\n"
> +	"       /help                -- Static help text\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0              -- Directory for SPMI bus 0\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0/0-1          -- Directory for SPMI device '0-1'\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0/0-1/address  -- Starting register for reads or writes\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0/0-1/count    -- Number of registers to read (only used for reads)\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0/0-1/data     -- Initiates the SPMI read (formatted output)\n"
> +	"       /spmi-0/0-1/data_raw -- Initiates the SPMI raw read or write\n"
> +	"       /spmi-n              -- Directory for SPMI bus n\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"To perform SPMI read or write transactions, you need to first write the\n"
> +	"address of the slave device register to the 'address' file.  For read\n"
> +	"transactions, the number of bytes to be read needs to be written to the\n"
> +	"'count' file.\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"The 'address' file specifies the 20-bit address of a slave device register.\n"
> +	"The upper 4 bits 'address[19..16]' specify the slave identifier (SID) for\n"
> +	"the slave device.  The lower 16 bits specify the slave register address.\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Reading from the 'data' file will initiate a SPMI read transaction starting\n"
> +	"from slave register 'address' for 'count' number of bytes.\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Writing to the 'data' file will initiate a SPMI write transaction starting\n"
> +	"from slave register 'address'.  The number of registers written to will\n"
> +	"match the number of bytes written to the 'data' file.\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Example: Read 4 bytes starting at register address 0x1234 for SID 2\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"echo 0x21234 > address\n"
> +	"echo 4 > count\n"
> +	"cat data\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Example: Write 3 bytes starting at register address 0x1008 for SID 1\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"echo 0x11008 > address\n"
> +	"echo 0x01 0x02 0x03 > data\n"
> +	"\n"
> +	"Note that the count file is not used for writes.  Since 3 bytes are\n"
> +	"written to the 'data' file, then 3 bytes will be written across the\n"
> +	"SPMI bus.\n\n";

The help file within the kernel is a nice touch :)

I do know the only rule for debugfs is "There are no rules", but this
looks like you are going to have the way to interact to this bus and
devices as debugfs, is that correct?

Or is this only for "debugging"?  If so, please document it as such.

> +void spmi_dfs_controller_add(struct spmi_controller *ctrl)
> +{
> +	ctrl->dfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(dev_name(&ctrl->dev),
> +					   spmi_debug_root);
> +	WARN_ON(!ctrl->dfs_dir);

Why?  What is a user going to be able to do with something like this?
You do this in a number of places, please provide "valid" error messages
instead of just kernel stack tracebacks, failing to show the device for
which the error occured (hint, use dev_err()).

Again, never use WARN_ON() as error handling, it's lazy, and wrong.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/