linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH next]module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed too early

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130822040333.GB4821@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:03:33 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Li Zhong <zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-next list <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH next]module: Fix mod->mkobj.kobj potentially freed
 too early

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:34:06AM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 09:18 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 05:49:58PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> > > DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE helps to find the issue attached below.
> > > 
> > > After some investigation, it seems the reason is:
> > > The mod->mkobj.kobj(ffffffffa01600d0 below) is freed together with mod
> > > itself in free_module(). However, its children still hold references to
> > > it, as the delay caused by DEBUG_KOBJECT_RELEASE. So when the
> > > child(holders below) tries to decrease the reference count to its parent
> > > in kobject_del(), BUG happens as it tries to access already freed memory.
> > 
> > Ah, thanks for tracking this down.  I had seen this in my local testing,
> > but wasn't able to figure out the offending code.
> > 
> > > This patch tries to fix it by waiting for the mod->mkobj.kobj to be
> > > really released in the module removing process (and some error code
> > > paths).
> > 
> > Nasty, we should just be freeing the structure in the release function,
> > why doesn't that work?
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> It seems I didn't describe it clearly in the previous mail. I'm trying
> to do it better below: 
> 
> mod->mkobj.kobj is embedded in module_kobject(not a pointer):
> struct module_kobject {
>         struct kobject kobj;
> 	...
> 
> and allocated with the module memory. So we could see the parent below
> ffffffffa01600d0 is between MODULES_VADDR (ffffffffa0000000) and
> MODULES_END(ffffffffff000000). 
> 
> It seem to me that the mkobj.kobj is freed by module_free(mod,
> mod->module_core). 

Ick, you are right.  If a kobject is being embedded in an object, it
should control the lifespan of the object, not somewhere else like is
happening here.

The best solution for this is to make the kobject a pointer, not
embedded in the structure, that will fix this issue, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/