linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20130822145549.7d2de2bd1209fdc850df3198@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:55:49 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, mmarek@...e.cz, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, jdike@...toit.com,
	gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] um: Create defconfigs for i386 and x86_64

Hi Richard,

On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:25 +0200 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
>
> Instead of having one defconfig for both i386 and x86_64
> we have now two.
> This is the first step to get rid of SUBARCH.
> 
> This patch is based on: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/4/396
> 
> Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> ---
>  arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig   | 954 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig | 943 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 1897 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/i386_defconfig
>  create mode 100644 arch/um/configs/x86_64_defconfig

Can these still work if put through "make savedefconfig" like other
architectures defconfig files?  I did a test and they produce files that
are only 74-75 lines long and the resulting files produced the
same .config when used in place of their originals.  But I only did that
test on an X86_64 host, so I just don't know if there is some strangeness
of um that would stop us using them.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped