lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5217194B.2020209@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:41:55 +0530
From:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] sched, fair: Optimize find_busiest_queue()

Hi Peter,

On 08/19/2013 09:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

In the load balancing code, looks to me that
cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask) is not updating the env.cpus at all,
before calling find_busiest_group(). Am I missing something?

Should not cpumask_copy() below be before we update the env.cpus parameter?

static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
			struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
			int *balance)
{
	int ld_moved, cur_ld_moved, active_balance = 0;
	struct sched_group *group;
	struct rq *busiest;
	unsigned long flags;
	struct cpumask *cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_mask);

	struct lb_env env = {
		.sd		= sd,
		.dst_cpu	= this_cpu,
		.dst_rq		= this_rq,
		.dst_grpmask    = sched_group_cpus(sd->groups),
		.idle		= idle,
		.loop_break	= sched_nr_migrate_break,
		.cpus		= cpus,
	};

	/*
	 * For NEWLY_IDLE load_balancing, we don't need to consider
	 * other cpus in our group
	 */
	if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE)
		env.dst_grpmask = NULL;

	cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);

	schedstat_inc(sd, lb_count[idle]);
redo:
	group = find_busiest_group(&env, balance);

Regards
Preeti U Murthy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ