lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130823091537.GL6617@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:15:37 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if
	UP system

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 12:51:59AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Blah.  OK then, just send it to Thomas.
> 
> Initially this code was written and committed by RMK which is why I 
> suggested you send him the fix.

It _should_, because the author of the file presumably knows how the
driver is supposed to work much better than the maintainer of the
subsystem.  So driver authors _should_ always be involved in the
handling of the patch.

Unfortunately, that rarely happens, and I've given up any hope of the
old kernel process(es) remaining where authors were responsible for the
code they wrote.  Somehow, kernel maintanence has been perversed so that
subsystem maintainers get to decide whether patches to drivers that they
don't have hardware for are to be applied irrespective of whether the
driver author has any input to it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ