lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130823100135.GA29137@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:01:35 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Cc:	device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: dm: allow error target to replace either bio-based and
 request-based targets

On Thu, Aug 22 2013 at 11:14pm -0400,
Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> wrote:

> Hello Mike,
> 
> On 08/23/13 09:17, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >> I do like the idea of a single error target that is hybrid (supports
> >> both bio-based and request-based) but the DM core would need to be
> >> updated to support this.
> >>
> >> Specifically, we'd need to check if the device (and active table) is
> >> already bio-based or request-based and select the appropriate type.  If
> >> it is a new device, default to selecting bio-based.
> >>
> >> There are some wrappers and other logic thoughout DM core that will need
> >> auditing too.
> > 
> > Here is a patch that should work for your needs (I tested it to work
> > with 'dmsetup wipe_table' on both request-based and bio-based devices):
> 
> How about moving the default handling in dm_table_set_type() outside of
> the for-each-target loop, like the modified patch below?
> 
> For example, if a table has 2 targets, hybrid and request_based,
> and live_md_type is DM_TYPE_NONE, the table should be considered as
> request_based, not inconsistent.
> Though the end result is same as such a table is rejected by other
> constraint anyway, I think it's good to keep the semantics clean
> and error messages consistent.
> 
> I.e. for the above case, the error message should be
> "Request-based dm doesn't support multiple targets yet",
> not "Inconsistent table: different target types can't be mixed up".

Hi,

Looks good, I'll fold your changes in and add your Signed-off-by.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ