[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52175D45.4010506@fold.natur.cuni.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:01:57 +0200
From: Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@...d.natur.cuni.cz>
To: Martin Mokrejs <mmokrejs@...d.natur.cuni.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
mingo@...hat.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling activated
Martin Mokrejs wrote:
>>>> Nope, you get that message once to tell you that we throttle RT tasks.
>>>
>>> I think the message could improved to explain this is a warn ONCE message and
>>> that there is no "[sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling deactivated" counterpart
>>> message to be anticipated.
>>
>> Would something like:
>>
>> sched: [ONCE] RT throttle hit -- inspect system configuration.
>>
>> Be a better message?
>
> Not really. I would prefer something like:
>
> [sched_delayed] sched: stopped running $cmd on CPU%d in favor of RR/FIFO task $psname
Actually, to retain the message text appearing in current kernel so that people can find
by e.g. Google newer syntax and possibly this thread maybe much better would be:
[sched_delayed] sched: RT throttling limit $d hit. Stopped running $cmd on CPU%d in favor of RR/FIFO task $psname. Will not issue any more these messages until reboot.
I know, looong line.
I just realized this is about some threshold limit value, and you mean that iwlwifi
contributed the highest increase compared to the other kernel threads on my system.
sysctl -q -a | grep -i limit
does not show what is the actual value. Am probably looking into a wrong place. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists