lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1377270227-1030-5-git-send-email-s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:03:46 +0200
From:	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, mturquette@...aro.org,
	jiada_wang@...tor.com, broonie@...nel.org, vapier@...too.org,
	ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
	myungjoo.ham@...sung.com, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, LW@...O-electronics.de,
	t.figa@...sung.com, g.liakhovetski@....de,
	laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] clk: Assign module owner of a clock being registered

Assign module owner of a driver of a device passed to _clk_register()
and __clk_register() functions so the module_{get,put} calls in
__clk_get(), __clk_put() can have required effect.

Signed-off-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
---
Initially I had an 'owner' field added to struct clk_init_data so it can
be set explicitly in clock providers.  But this required modifications
of all users of (devm_)clk_register() as struct clk_init_data instance
was in most cases an unitialized stack variable.  This would also require
adding yet another argument to various clk_register_* functions
registering the standard clocks.  So I went for assigning clk->owner from
dev->driver->owner.  The disadvantages are that dereferencing dev->driver
may be potentially unsafe when not holding struct device::mutex.  And
there might be cases where clk->owner will need to be NULL.  One option
is to set dev argument of clk_register_*() to NULL for that, but it
predates devm_*.

Presumably a requirement could be added that callers of clk_register*()
must ensure dev->driver won't change during a call to these functions ?
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index c173f30..272d68d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -1692,6 +1692,10 @@ struct clk *__clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw)
 	clk->flags = hw->init->flags;
 	clk->parent_names = hw->init->parent_names;
 	clk->num_parents = hw->init->num_parents;
+	if (dev && dev->driver)
+		clk->owner = dev->driver->owner;
+	else
+		clk->owner = NULL;

 	ret = __clk_init(dev, clk);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1712,6 +1716,8 @@ static int _clk_register(struct device *dev, struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk *clk)
 		goto fail_name;
 	}
 	clk->ops = hw->init->ops;
+	if (dev && dev->driver)
+		clk->owner = dev->driver->owner;
 	clk->hw = hw;
 	clk->flags = hw->init->flags;
 	clk->num_parents = hw->init->num_parents;
--
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ