linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdYAjKhKC+Aaa4iQBXsJ46mgOta_SVztVyB=HZCGJD-b2g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:38:04 +0200
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>,
	Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
	Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Jon Hunter <jgchunter@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 08/21/2013 05:27 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 21 of August 2013 15:38:54 Lars Poeschel wrote:
>>
>>>>> To solve this dilemma, perform an interrupt consistency check
>>>>> when adding a GPIO chip: if the chip is both gpio-controller and
>>>>> interrupt-controller, walk all children of the device tree,
>>>
>>> It seems a little odd to solve this only for DT. What about the non-DT case?
>>
>> DT is the hardware configuration system that lets you request
>> the same resource in two ways, i.e. it allows one and the same
>> node to be both gpio-controller and interrupt-controller, and
>> start handing out the same line as both GPIO and IRQ
>> independently.
>
> Huh? What stops systems using board files and platform data from having
> this issue?

It can't be stopped but I consider it a bug if they do, as the proper
way to handle such GPIO lines is the sequence:

request_gpio(gpio);
request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio));

But I was mainly contrasting against ACPI, where the problem appears
to not exist.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/