[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZMsBynLohhNw=XyzpYns9E8QVksVJYkv3dcRJ2JHWLnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:10:00 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>
Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: mcp23s08: rename the device tree property
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de> wrote:
> From: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
>
> The device tree property should be more descriptive.
> microchip seems more reasonable than mcp. As there are no
> in tree users of this property, so the rename can still be
> done without pain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>
So do I apply this to the GPIO tree now or what?
Are the DT custodians happy?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists