linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5217B54E.8070009@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:17:34 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
CC:	bcousson@...libre.com, tony@...mide.com, myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
	cw00.choi@...sung.com, rob.herring@...xeda.com, pawel.moll@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, ian.campbell@...rix.com, rob@...dley.net,
	george.cherian@...com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] extcon: palmas: Added a new compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*

On 08/23/2013 05:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Friday 23 August 2013 02:20 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/22/2013 02:31 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a
>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible
>>> types for backward compatibility.
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/extcon/extcon-palmas.txt
>>
>>>  PALMAS USB COMPARATOR
>>>  Required Properties:
>>> - - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb" or "ti,twl6035-usb"
>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,palmas-usb-vid". "ti,twl6035-usb" and
>>> +   "ti,palmas-usb" is deprecated and is kept for backward compatibility.
>>
>> So this defines one new value and deprecates the two old values.
> 
> yeah.
>>
>> Why isn't a new "ti,twl6035-usb-vid" entry useful? Don't you still need
> 
> yeah, it should be added too.
>> SoC-specific compatible values so the driver can enable any SoC-specific
>> bug-fixes/workarounds later if needed?
> 
> hmm.. Palmas is external to SoC. So not sure if adding SoC specific compatible
> values is such a good idea.

In this case, but SoC, I meant the Palmas chip rather than the
application processor. Is twl6035 a name for Palmas or something else?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/