linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] misc: (at24) move header to linux/platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1033284781.908504.1377285587778.JavaMail.root@mail>
Date:	Fri, 23 Aug 2013 15:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: (at24) move header to linux/platform_data/

Wolfram wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 02:38:20PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> > This patch moves the at24.h header from include/linux/i2c to
> > include/linux/platform_data and updates existing support
> > accordingly.
> 
> This message explains what the patch does but not why the change is
> wanted. I'd be surprised if we really want *all* platform_data in one
> single directory?

IMHO it makes sense. Why wouldn't we want all platform_data in
include/linux/platform_data/?

> Is this patch part of a bigger series?
No.

> That being said i2c is not the best place for this include, in deed...
I agree.

Thanks,
Vivien
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/