[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5217E9A5.8030503@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 01:00:53 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
jiada_wang@...tor.com, robherring2@...il.com,
grant.likely@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org, vapier@...too.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, kyungmin.park@...sung.com,
shawn.guo@...aro.org, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
LW@...O-electronics.de, t.figa@...sung.com, g.liakhovetski@....de,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] clk: implement clk_unregister
On 08/23/2013 11:58 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> +static void clk_nodrv_disable_unprepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> > +{
>> > + WARN_ON(1);
>
> Ideally we shouldn't get here, but if we do I guess it could be very
> noisy. How about WARN_ONCE?
Yes, I guess that would be much better. I could resend it tomorrow if
needed.
> After you address Russell's comments in patch #1 I will be happy to take
> this series.
I have posted today v3 addressing Russell's comments. Hopefully patch #3
(the patches got reordered) looks OK now. v3 includes actual assigning
of clk->owner I somehow managed to miss in previous series :/ Please have
a look at it.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists