[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130823043248.GF23960@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:32:48 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Heiko St??bner <heiko@...ech.de>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Matt Sealey <neko@...uhatsu.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] clk: dt: bindings for mux, divider & gate clocks
On 08/21, Mike Turquette wrote:
>
> I just happened across a to-do list note telling me to respond to this
> email. Better late than never.
>
[snip]
>
> This is a way to establish initial configuration from the consumer's
> perspective. Similarly something can be done for the clock rate with
> assigned-clock-rate.
Ok. Thanks for the information. Unfortunately it isn't what I
thought it was.
>
> With all of that said this is consumer-level stuff. We'll definitely
> talk about the clock provider DT bindings at the ARM Summit, which is
> what you discuss above.
I can't wait another 2 months to start discussing the clock
provider DT bindings. We need to discuss it on the list.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists