[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130825200605.GC27005@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 21:06:06 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Tighten up linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH)
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:57:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Yes. I think we should do this, but I think we should also look at
> what _other_ LOOKUP_xyz we should do for the /proc case.
>
> For the read-only fd case, we should have a LOOKUP_WRITE flag, and
> return -EPERM if an operation is a write, and we terminate in that
> LAST_BIND case.
>
> That would catch the truncate() case, but also the "open a read-only
> fd for write or O_TRUNC" case.
>
> Anything else? What other path operations matter that follow links
> than truncate(), link() and open()?
Timestamp updates, chmod/chown, xattr mess...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists