[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130825072346.31655.84970.stgit@ladj378.jer.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:23:46 +0300
From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: [PATCH net] net: add cpu_relax to busy poll loop
Add a cpu_relaxt to sk_busy_loop.
Julie Cummings reported performance issues when hyperthreading is on.
Arjan van de Ven observed that we should have a cpu_relax() in the
busy poll loop.
Reported-by: Julie Cummings <julie.a.cummings@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
---
include/net/busy_poll.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/busy_poll.h b/include/net/busy_poll.h
index 8a358a2..829627d 100644
--- a/include/net/busy_poll.h
+++ b/include/net/busy_poll.h
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static inline bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)
/* local bh are disabled so it is ok to use _BH */
NET_ADD_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk),
LINUX_MIB_BUSYPOLLRXPACKETS, rc);
+ cpu_relax();
} while (!nonblock && skb_queue_empty(&sk->sk_receive_queue) &&
!need_resched() && !busy_loop_timeout(end_time));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists