[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxaKGcpdxKXK_axqyFz_oCvFm1Q=_fJLq8di97x_-cCig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:57:25 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: Tighten up linkat(..., AT_EMPTY_PATH)
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I'm tempted to try the following trick:
> * introduce FMODE_FLINK in file->f_mode; O_TMPFILE would set it,
> unless O_EXCL is present.
> * introduce LOOKUP_LINK, to be passed by sys_linkat() when
> resolving the target.
[ .. snipped .. ]
Yes. I think we should do this, but I think we should also look at
what _other_ LOOKUP_xyz we should do for the /proc case.
For the read-only fd case, we should have a LOOKUP_WRITE flag, and
return -EPERM if an operation is a write, and we terminate in that
LAST_BIND case.
That would catch the truncate() case, but also the "open a read-only
fd for write or O_TRUNC" case.
Anything else? What other path operations matter that follow links
than truncate(), link() and open()?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists