[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1377506916-26946-4-git-send-email-raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:18:35 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<gleb@...hat.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: <jeremy@...p.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <agraf@...e.de>,
digitaleric@...gle.com, <riel@...hat.com>, <avi.kivity@...il.com>,
<habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <chegu_vinod@...com>,
<ouyang@...pitt.edu>, <drjones@...hat.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<andi@...stfloor.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<mtosatti@...hat.com>, <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH V13 3/4] kvm hypervisor: Simplify kvm_for_each_vcpu with kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic
Note that we are using APIC_DM_REMRD which has reserved usage.
In future if APIC_DM_REMRD usage is standardized, then we should
find some other way or go back to old method.
Suggested-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 25 ++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index afc1124..48c13c9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -706,7 +706,10 @@ out:
break;
case APIC_DM_REMRD:
- apic_debug("Ignoring delivery mode 3\n");
+ result = 1;
+ vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = 1;
+ kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
+ kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
break;
case APIC_DM_SMI:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 1e73dab..640d112 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -5502,27 +5502,14 @@ int kvm_hv_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
static void kvm_pv_kick_cpu_op(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long flags, int apicid)
{
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = NULL;
- int i;
+ struct kvm_lapic_irq lapic_irq;
- kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (!kvm_apic_present(vcpu))
- continue;
+ lapic_irq.shorthand = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_mode = 0;
+ lapic_irq.dest_id = apicid;
- if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, 0, 0, apicid, 0))
- break;
- }
- if (vcpu) {
- /*
- * Setting unhalt flag here can result in spurious runnable
- * state when unhalt reset does not happen in vcpu_block.
- * But that is harmless since that should soon result in halt.
- */
- vcpu->arch.pv.pv_unhalted = true;
- /* We need everybody see unhalt before vcpu unblocks */
- smp_wmb();
- kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
- }
+ lapic_irq.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_REMRD;
+ kvm_irq_delivery_to_apic(kvm, 0, &lapic_irq, NULL);
}
int kvm_emulate_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists