[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521B16B9.4000203@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:01 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: x86-32: Early microcode loading stumbles over disabled DYNAMIC_FTRACE
On 2013-08-23 22:17, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 06:40:46PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Below some hunks to get it working again - at least in the absence of
>> any microcode in the initrd. Marking all involved functions as __init
>> is another option (as __init implies notrace). But I bet there is more
>> hidden. I see e.g. a pr_warn() in find_cpio_init that should trigger
>> the issue as well if we hit the error it reports (btw. printing at
>> this point of the boot should not work anyway, should it?).
>
> I guess we can do early_printk there instead as x86_64_start_kernel()
> does it but I'm not sure for the 32-bit case where we call
> load_ucode_bsp/ap before we've even enabled paging.
early_printk doesn't seem to work as well on 32-bit until paging was
enabled.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT RTC ITP SES-DE
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists