[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <521B1A87.4000500@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:06:15 +0900
From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>,
'Chris Ball' <cjb@...top.org>,
'Jaehoon Chung' <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
'James Hogan' <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
'Grant Grundler' <grundler@...omium.org>,
'Alim Akhtar' <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
'Abhilash Kesavan' <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
'Tomasz Figa' <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
'Olof Johansson' <olof@...om.net>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/3] mmc: dw_mmc: Honor requests to set the clock to 0
(turn off clock)
On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
>> card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good thing in general, but had
>> one extra bad side effect in the following situtation:
>> * mmc core would set clk to 400kHz at boot time while initting
>> * mmc core would set clk to 0 since no card, but it would be ignored.
>> * suspend to ram and resume; clocks in the dw_mmc IP block are now 0
>> but dw_mmc thinks that they're 400kHz (it ignored the set to 0).
>> * insert card
>> * mmc core would set clk to 400kHz which would be considered a no-op.
>>
>> Note that if there is no card in the slot and we do a suspend/resume
>> cycle, we _do_ still end up with differences in a dw_mmc register
>> dump, but the differences are clock related and we've got the clock
>> disabled both before and after, so this should be OK.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> Changes in v6:
>> - Replaces previous pathes that ensured saving/restoring clocks.
>>
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index ee5f167..f6c7545 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -635,7 +635,11 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>> u32 div;
>> u32 clk_en_a;
>>
>> - if (slot->clock != host->current_speed || force_clkinit) {
>> + if (slot->clock == 0) {
>> + mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
>> + mci_send_cmd(slot,
>> + SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
> Basically dw_mmc driver uses host's low power mode(auto clock gating)
> So, how about keeping origin code rather than programming clock setting to '0'?
Right, Dw-mmc controller can use the Low-power mode.
This mode is functionality like clock-gating. Well, i didn't know what benefit we get, if set to 0.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
>> + } else if (slot->clock != host->current_speed || force_clkinit) {
> And then, if condition('slot->clock is not zero') is added in order to allow to set clock,
> print messages which Jaehoon pointed would be solved.
>
> Thanks,
> Seungwon Jeon
>
>> div = host->bus_hz / slot->clock;
>> if (host->bus_hz % slot->clock && host->bus_hz > slot->clock)
>> /*
>> @@ -675,9 +679,8 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
>> /* inform CIU */
>> mci_send_cmd(slot,
>> SDMMC_CMD_UPD_CLK | SDMMC_CMD_PRV_DAT_WAIT, 0);
>> -
>> - host->current_speed = slot->clock;
>> }
>> + host->current_speed = slot->clock;
>>
>> /* Set the current slot bus width */
>> mci_writel(host, CTYPE, (slot->ctype << slot->id));
>> @@ -807,13 +810,11 @@ static void dw_mci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>
>> mci_writel(slot->host, UHS_REG, regs);
>>
>> - if (ios->clock) {
>> - /*
>> - * Use mirror of ios->clock to prevent race with mmc
>> - * core ios update when finding the minimum.
>> - */
>> - slot->clock = ios->clock;
>> - }
>> + /*
>> + * Use mirror of ios->clock to prevent race with mmc
>> + * core ios update when finding the minimum.
>> + */
>> + slot->clock = ios->clock;
>>
>> if (drv_data && drv_data->set_ios)
>> drv_data->set_ios(slot->host, ios);
>> --
>> 1.8.3
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists