[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521B2DE1.4060306@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:58:49 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, agraf@...e.de,
digitaleric@...gle.com, riel@...hat.com, avi.kivity@...il.com,
habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, chegu_vinod@...com,
ouyang@...pitt.edu, drjones@...hat.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, mtosatti@...hat.com,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V13 0/4] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks for KVM host
On 08/26/2013 03:34 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 02:18:32PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>
>> This series forms the kvm host part of paravirtual spinlock
>> based against kvm tree.
>>
>> Please refer to https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/265 for
>> kvm guest and Xen, x86 part merged to -tip spinlocks.
>>
>> Please note that:
>> kvm uapi: Add KICK_CPU and PV_UNHALT definition to uapi is a common patch
>> for both guest and host.
>>
> Thanks, applied. The patchset is not against kvm.git queue though, so I
> had to fix one minor conflict manually.
Thank you Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists