linux-kernel - [tip:x86/apic] x86/ioapic: Check attr against the previous setting when programmed more than once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-25aa2957973d361081ac6c8b6e5a0d9d7a83fef6@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 04:58:37 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Liu Ping Fan <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	yinghai@...nel.org, haokexin@...il.com,
	pingfank@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kernelfans@...il.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, len.brown@...el.com
Subject: [tip:x86/apic] x86/ioapic:
  Check attr against the previous setting when programmed more than once

Commit-ID:  25aa2957973d361081ac6c8b6e5a0d9d7a83fef6
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/25aa2957973d361081ac6c8b6e5a0d9d7a83fef6
Author:     Liu Ping Fan <kernelfans@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:58:47 +0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:58:00 +0200

x86/ioapic: Check attr against the previous setting when programmed more than once

When programming ioapic pinX more than once, current code
does not check whether the later attr (trigger & polarity) is the
same as the former or not.

This causes broken semantics which can be observed in a qemu q35
machine, where ioapic's ioredtbl[x] can never be set as low-active,
even if the hpet driver registered it.

And hpet driver may share a high-level active IRQ line with other
devices. So in qemu, when hpet-dev asserts low-level as kernel
expects, the kernel has no response.

With this patch, we can observe an ioredtbl[x] set as low-active
for hpet.

Fix it by reporting -EBUSY to the caller, when attr is different.

Signed-off-by: Liu Ping Fan <pingfank@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1377248327-19633-1-git-send-email-pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com
[ Made small readability edits to both the changelog and the code. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c    | 5 ++++-
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 9 ++++++---
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 872a2d2..81aa73b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
 	int ioapic;
 	int ioapic_pin;
 	struct io_apic_irq_attr irq_attr;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (acpi_irq_model != ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_IOAPIC)
 		return gsi;
@@ -1149,7 +1150,9 @@ int mp_register_gsi(struct device *dev, u32 gsi, int trigger, int polarity)
 	set_io_apic_irq_attr(&irq_attr, ioapic, ioapic_pin,
 			     trigger == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ? 0 : 1,
 			     polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH ? 0 : 1);
-	io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr);
+	ret = io_apic_set_pci_routing(dev, gsi_to_irq(gsi), &irq_attr);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		gsi = INT_MIN;
 
 	return gsi;
 }
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
index 260abc2..e63a5bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
@@ -3380,12 +3380,15 @@ int io_apic_setup_irq_pin_once(unsigned int irq, int node,
 {
 	unsigned int ioapic_idx = attr->ioapic, pin = attr->ioapic_pin;
 	int ret;
+	struct IO_APIC_route_entry orig_entry;
 
 	/* Avoid redundant programming */
 	if (test_bit(pin, ioapics[ioapic_idx].pin_programmed)) {
-		pr_debug("Pin %d-%d already programmed\n",
-			 mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic_idx), pin);
-		return 0;
+		pr_debug("Pin %d-%d already programmed\n", mpc_ioapic_id(ioapic_idx), pin);
+		orig_entry = ioapic_read_entry(attr->ioapic, pin);
+		if (attr->trigger == orig_entry.trigger && attr->polarity == orig_entry.polarity)
+			return 0;
+		return -EBUSY;
 	}
 	ret = io_apic_setup_irq_pin(irq, node, attr);
 	if (!ret)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/