[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130826120919.GL31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:09:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Lei Wen <leiwen@...vell.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched, fair: Fix the sd_parent_degenerate() code
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM -0700, Paul Turner wrote:
> > @@ -5157,6 +5158,13 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *s
> > tmp->parent = parent->parent;
> > if (parent->parent)
> > parent->parent->child = tmp;
> > + /*
> > + * Transfer SD_PREFER_SIBLING down in case of a
> > + * degenerate parent; the spans match for this
> > + * so the property transfers.
> > + */
> > + if (parent->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
> > + tmp->flags |= SD_PREFER_SIBLING;
> > destroy_sched_domain(parent, cpu);
> > } else
> > tmp = tmp->parent;
> >
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
BTW, did that comment make sense to you or would you suggest something
different? I had/am having a hard time with that comment. Somehow it
leaves me wanting. I know I understand the issue now, but I'll doubt the
comment will suffice in a years time :/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists