linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing for 'cooling-zones'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <521B4666.3050509@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 08:13:26 -0400
From:	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, <wni@...dia.com>,
	"R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/14] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: add dt node parsing
 for 'cooling-zones'

On 26-08-2013 00:42, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 August 2013 04:45, Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
>> index ad1fde2..ede6487 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c
>> @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/thermal.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> 
> In alphabetical order please..
> 

OK.

>> @@ -268,6 +272,13 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>                 goto out_free_table;
>>         }
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * For now, just loading the cooling device;
>> +        * thermal DT code takes care of matching them.
>> +        */
>> +       if (of_find_property(np, "cooling-zones", NULL))
>> +               cdev = cpufreq_cooling_register(cpu_present_mask);
> 
> Should we check if it passed or failed? And if failed Atleast flag an
> appropriate message?
> 

Yes, we need error checking code. I will add in next version. Thanks Kumar.

> 


-- 
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)

Eduardo Valentin


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (296 bytes)