[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521B7A5F.7030101@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 09:55:11 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
CC: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Zhang <zhangwm@...vell.com>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: coupled: disable interrupts after entering
safe state
On 08/23/2013 06:22 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
>> On 08/23/2013 01:45 PM, Colin Cross wrote:
>>> Calling cpuidle_enter_state is expected to return with interrupts
>>> enabled, but interrupts must be disabled before starting the
>>> ready loop synchronization stage. Call local_irq_disable after
>>> each call to cpuidle_enter_state for the safe state.
>>
>> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
>>
>> Note: I tested the current Tegra cpuidle code that's in next-20130819.
>> IIRC, Joseph reported the issue when trying to enable some additional
>> feature in Tegra30 cpuidle. I didn't actually try to enable whatever
>> that was; I just briefly tested for regressions in the existing code
>> configuration.
>
> Is that for the series or just this patch?
The series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists