linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] gpio: New driver for LSI ZEVIO SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <521B88FE.4070000@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:57:34 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Fabian Vogt <fabian@...ter-vogt.de>
CC:	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, grant.likely@...aro.org,
	pawel.moll@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] gpio: New driver for LSI ZEVIO SoCs

On 08/25/2013 01:44 PM, Fabian Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> On 08/07/2013 06:53 AM, Fabian Vogt wrote:
>>> This driver supports the GPIO controller found in LSI ZEVIO SoCs.
>>> It has been successfully tested on a TI nspire CX calculator.
>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-zevio.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-zevio.txt
>>
>>> +Zevio GPIO controller
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible = "lsi,zevio-gpio"
>>
>> Is there only one zevio chip, or a series? Is "zevio" the full name of
>> the chip, including any version number?
>
> We don't know, it's a relableled chip with
> TI-NSPIRE / L9A0702 / TI-NS2006A-0 / LSI LOGIC / ZEVIO / U 0714 /
> WYJ14052-1
> on it. But this driver should match the other drivers (lsi,zevio-intc,
> lsi,zevio-timer).

OK, I guess that's fine then. I suppose if we find "zevio2" chips, we
can always use that for the compatible value later.

>>> +- reg = <BASEADDR SIZE>
>>> +- #gpio-cells = <2>
>>> +- gpio-controller;
>>> +
>>> +Optional:
>>> +- #ngpios = <32>: Number of GPIOs. Defaults to 32 if absent
>>
>> Perhaps one can derive that from the compatible value? The fact this
>> property exists implies there's more than one zevio chip, so perhaps
>> each should have an explicit compatible value described above?
>
> I added it just for someone who maybe needs it. It's only two lines and
> maybe
> it'll be helpful for someone. We don't know whether some similiar or
> this controller
> exist in different configurations (pin count, section sice, register
> layout).
> Also I hate hardcoded values which require a recompile to change..

If there's no reason for this property, I think we should remove it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/